State’s Response to Defense Motions (Washington v. Miller)

Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Snohomish County, WA | Oct 21, 2020

Prosecution addresses four evidentiary issues raised in the case including:

relevance of jail calls made by the defendant,
access to firearms,
newspaper articles, and
statistical probability not necessary pertaining a to female fraction in a differential extraction.

Related Resource(s)

Washington v. Miller – Case Resources

October 2020 Investigative Resource Repository,Post-Charge - Case,Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Snohomish County, WA Washington v. Miller

1) Affidavit of Probable Cause 2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Evidence 3) Defense Trial Brief and Motions in Limine 4) State’s Response to Defense Motions...

Defense Trial Brief and Motions in Limine (Washington v. Miller)

October 2020 Investigative Resource Repository,Post-Charge and Trial Issues,Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Snohomish County, WA Washington v. Miller

In advance of trial, the defense submits a host of evidentiary issues and advances objections to evidence anticipated for trial...

Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Evidence (Washington v. Miller)

October 2020 Investigative Resource Repository,Post-Charge and Trial Issues,Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Snohomish County, WA Washington v. Miller

Defendant’s motion to exclude evidence based on deficient chain of custody and testimonial foundation which included a lack of witnesses...

Affidavit of Probable Cause (Washington v. Miller)

February 2019 Investigative Resource Repository,Post-Charge and Trial Issues,Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Snohomish County, WA Washington v. Miller

Prosecutor’s charging affidavit detailing a 1972 murder-sexual offense case which includes details of the investigation such as the steps of Forensic Genetic Genealogy, the suspect’s criminal history, and charges brought against the suspect in 2019...