State’s Objection and Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Canyon County, ID | Apr 10, 2024

Prosecution’s response to defense’s claim of Fourth Amendment violation in a murder-sexual offense case. The State attached, as an exhibit, the Minnesota trial court’s ruling on this issue in State v. Westrom. See Minnesota Supreme Court’s opinion in the Westrom Case, upholding the trial court’s ruling here.

Related Resource(s)

Idaho v. Dalrymple – Case Resources

1) State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 2) Memorandum in Support of State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 3) State’s Motion to Re-Open Previously Filed and Ruled Upon Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 4) State’s Objection and Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress 5) Defense’s Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress 6)...

Defense’s Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Suspect’s hair that was found from the crime scene of a murder-sexual offense case was subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism extraction and genealogical search. Defense claims these techniques violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment and the State of Idaho’s privacy rights of a suspect...

State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Prosecution requests non-disclosure of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) process in developing investigative leads in this murder-sexual offense case...