Defense’s Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Canyon County, ID | Apr 5, 2024

Suspect’s hair that was found from the crime scene of a murdersexual offense case was subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism extraction and genealogical search. Defense claims these techniques violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment and the State of Idaho’s privacy rights of a suspect.

Related Resource(s)

Idaho v. Dalrymple – Case Resources

1) State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 2) Memorandum in Support of State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 3) State’s Motion to Re-Open Previously Filed and Ruled Upon Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure 4) State’s Objection and Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress 5) Defense’s Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress 6)...

State’s Objection and Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Prosecution’s response to defense’s claim of Fourth Amendment violation in a murder-sexual offense case. The State attached, as an exhibit, the Minnesota trial court’s ruling on this issue in State v. Westrom. See Minnesota Supreme Court’s opinion in the Westrom Case, upholding the trial court’s ruling here...

State’s Motion in Limine for Non-Disclosure (Idaho v. Dalrymple)

Prosecution requests non-disclosure of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) process in developing investigative leads in this murder-sexual offense case...