Prosecution’s memorandum in support of the motion in limine for non-disclosure of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy process, and the potential leads it generates, in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982.
Prosecution’s motion in limine for non-disclosure of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy process, and the potential leads it generates, in an Idaho murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1982.
Prosecution’s argument to block discovery of the Forensic Genetic Genealogy (FGG) investigative process in a Colorado sexual assault case that occurred in 2004. The prosecution seeks an ex parte, in camera hearing outside the presence of the defense to present to the court the FGG process and techniques and to respond to concerns or questions held by the court on this topic.
1) People’s Motion in Limine
2) People’s Response to Defense Motion to Dismiss for Pre-Indictment Delay
3) People’s Response to Defense Evidence Destruction Motion
Prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to dismiss the case due to destruction of evidence claims in a Colorado murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1994. The prosecution’s response centered on no showing of bad faith by the prosecution in failure to collect or preserve certain evidence.
Prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to dismiss the case due to a pre-indictment delay in a Colorado murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1994. The response addresses the defense’s due process arguments regarding the statute of limitations and the unavailability of witnesses and alternate suspects. The response also noted the advances in forensic techniques that occurred since the date of the incident which enabled investigators to utilize the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS).
Prosecution’s motion in limine in the trial of a Colorado murder-sexual offense that occurred in 1994. The prosecution sought to admit “sanitized” police encounters with the defendant that occurred in Denver during the timeframe prior to the murder to limit any unfairly prejudicial details or facts.
1) Affidavit of Probable Cause
2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Evidence
3) Defense Trial Brief and Motions in Limine
4) State’s Response to Defense Motions
Defense’s trial brief and motions in limine in a Washington murder-sexual offense case that occurred in 1972. This trial brief raises several evidentiary issues noting the defense’s objections to certain evidence anticipated for trial.
