Prosecution seeks admission of incriminating items the defendant in this 2004 sexual assault case possessed during an arrest in 2007. Argument and analysis of 404(b) type of evidence in context of items possessed at another time.
Court of Appeals decision holding that the defendant has no privacy interest in or standing to object to DNA recovered at a crime scene or in DNA of relatives that they have submitted to commercial databases.
Prosecution requests non-disclosure of Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG) process in developing investigative leads in this murder-sexual offense case.
1) People’s Motion in Limine
2) People’s Response to Defense Motion to Dismiss for Pre-Indictment Delay
3) People’s Response to Defense Evidence Destruction Motion
Prosecution argues that absent a showing of apparent exculpatory value of evidence not preserved and absent bad faith in not preserving such evidence, there is no basis for a due process violation and dismissal of the case.
